First, the church has always referred to the humbling (actually humiliation) of Christ, what Paul refers to as emptying Himself of His glory and descending to the lowest part of creation, and the exaltation of Christ, being glorified and exalted at the right hand of the Father. And it occurred to me that while many people are humbled (or humiliated) by circumstances, or behavior, or poor choices, or life reversals, Jesus voluntarily gave Himself into humility, and only one who is totally self-assured, who has no doubts about who He is or what God requires of Him in the moment, can do that so completely. And here's the mystery, that humiliation was not to bring Christ low, but to allow Him to fill all in all, leaving nothing untouched and everything charged with potential, awaiting only that day when He delivers up the Kingdom to His Father.
Second, as Christians we bemoan the fact that the world makes gods in their own image and likeness rather than the other way around. Paul again says that they exchange the glory of the living God for a false form. But I wonder if sometimes we (i.e. the church) also do not do the same thing. Oh, I am aware that theology claims to draw its conception of God solely from what is revealed in the scripture, and all of the creeds and confessions and catechisms can tack on a proof text or two to back up their statements, but sometimes I wonder if we still do not push the limits of what is revealed and rely too much instead on underlying philosophical suppositions that we have inherited somewhere along the way and don't even realize as being there.
For instance, we state that God is perfect, but to me that seems more of our idea rather than His. It is something we expect our God to be and we only speak of Him in superlatives such as immortal, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and so on. But that is the problem with theology, it is still something we do because of our bent to classify and dissect and integrate again. But it always comes back to the point that God must be thus and such because, in our minds, He could not be God unless He was that way. I came to this point indirectly as I moved from Christmas to the question as to why I exist. A perfect being is all sufficient, He has no needs and therefore angels and man and creation as a whole are unnecessary, and yet here we are. And I know theologians have asked the same question because they have written volumes to explain it and it always seems to come down to some form of we exist because God desires to display His glory. And it was just at that point that I said to myself, is this not a form of pride? Now as humans, we consider pride a sin, it is self seeking. But that is exactly what God displaying His glory does, it lifts Him up, exalts Him, demands our attention and worship. It is pride, but perfect pride, if there be such a thing. And when I get to thinking things like that I conclude that I don't, and probably most other people don't know God as surely as we think we know Him. And I'm fine with that. It just took Christmas to remind me once again of something that St. Augustine once said. It goes more or less like this, my words about You are so much less than my thoughts about You, but You are ever so much more than my thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment